From 7bce93a060b4627c34ead239a9944d8a3bdee78d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:42:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix(#166): point to reference

---
 review_answers/review_2_answers.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/review_answers/review_2_answers.md b/review_answers/review_2_answers.md
index 54423a1..d801ef7 100644
--- a/review_answers/review_2_answers.md
+++ b/review_answers/review_2_answers.md
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 > You define "research software" broadly but then say this definition is "the outcome of a recent discussion." Cite that discussion properly so readers can check it.
 
 **Answer:**
+We did refer to Gruenpeter M, et al.: Defining research software: A controversial discussion. FORCE11, Research Data Alliance, Research Software Alliance; Zenodo, Summary Report of FAIR4RS Subgroup 3 activity and discussion Version 1. Sep. 2021 to direct readers to this discussion. 
 
 ---