Skip to content

Add structural analysis to the SepTop protocol#1982

Merged
hannahbaumann merged 49 commits into
mainfrom
structural_analysis_septop
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

Add structural analysis to the SepTop protocol#1982
hannahbaumann merged 49 commits into
mainfrom
structural_analysis_septop

Conversation

@hannahbaumann

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Checklist

  • All new code is appropriately documented (user-facing code must have complete docstrings).
  • Added a news entry, or the changes are not user-facing.
  • Ran pre-commit: you can run pre-commit locally or comment on this PR with pre-commit.ci autofix.

Manual Tests: these are slow so don't need to be run every commit, only before merging and when relevant changes are made (generally at reviewer-discretion).

Developers certificate of origin

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann marked this pull request as draft May 28, 2026 10:05
@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann changed the title Add structural analysis to the SepTop protocol [WIP] Add structural analysis to the SepTop protocol May 28, 2026
@hannahbaumann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pre-commit.ci autofix

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann self-assigned this May 28, 2026
@hannahbaumann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This is what it would look like for the complex right now.

protein_2D_RMSD ligand_B_RMSD ligand_B_COM_drift ligand_A_RMSD ligand_A_COM_drift

@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.98276% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.60%. Comparing base (c9505a8) to head (3f2da12).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py 93.06% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1982      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.93%   90.60%   -4.34%     
==========================================
  Files         216      217       +1     
  Lines       20498    20725     +227     
==========================================
- Hits        19459    18777     -682     
- Misses       1039     1948     +909     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 90.60% <96.98%> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hannahbaumann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pre-commit.ci autofix

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2026 09:12
@hannahbaumann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pre-commit.ci autofix

Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py Outdated
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py Outdated
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py Outdated
@hannahbaumann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

As discussed offline, CI is currently breaking since the prev. openfe 1.11 results files for gather do not have the new analysis_settings. Should we turn them on by default to keep backward compatibility or remove the old test files and break backward compatibility? @IAlibay

Comment thread docs/guide/protocols/septop.rst Outdated
Comment thread docs/guide/protocols/septop.rst Outdated
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/equil_septop_settings.py Outdated
hannahbaumann and others added 3 commits June 11, 2026 11:02
Co-authored-by: Josh Horton <joshua.horton@openforcefield.org>
Co-authored-by: Irfan Alibay <IAlibay@users.noreply.github.com>
@hannahbaumann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pre-commit.ci autofix

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

overall looks good - just the one blocker for me re: settings

Comment thread docs/guide/protocols/septop.rst Outdated
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py Outdated
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py Outdated
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_septop/base_units.py Outdated
Comment thread src/openfe/protocols/openmm_utils/omm_settings.py
@hannahbaumann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pre-commit.ci autofix

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No API break detected ✅

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks!

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann merged commit 58d1e00 into main Jun 15, 2026
10 checks passed
@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann deleted the structural_analysis_septop branch June 15, 2026 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants