Describe epis in LRS#241
Merged
Merged
Conversation
c89b2ee to
392e36c
Compare
392e36c to
f988e6d
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The problem with that proof was: that monos are injective (which is correct) is not sufficient since a priori the rings in the structure sheaf could be arbitrary large. One needs to show that this cannot happen, using a more precise description of monomorphisms. I don't know exactly how this works, so for now, I just remove the claim.
Likewise, the proof that LRSR is well-copowered needed to be fixed since surjectivity of epis alone is not sufficient.