-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
CFE-4665: cfengine dev format docs should tell you what files it formatted
#144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sarakthon
wants to merge
1
commit into
cfengine:main
Choose a base branch
from
sarakthon:print-formatted-files
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ def _process_markdown_code_blocks( | |
| return | ||
|
|
||
| if syntax_check: | ||
| # We currently only print the filenames during linting, not formatting | ||
| print( | ||
| f"Processing code blocks (snippets) inside {origin_paths_len} markdown files:" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
@@ -268,6 +267,8 @@ def _process_markdown_code_blocks( | |
| if syntax_check and not parsed_markdowns["files"][origin_path]["code-blocks"]: | ||
| print(f"{prefix}SKIP: No code blocks in '{origin_path}'") | ||
| continue | ||
| if autoformat: | ||
| print(f"Formatting '{origin_path}'") | ||
|
Comment on lines
+270
to
+271
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We should print messages like in And these should only be printed if the file was reformatted (i.e. the file changed). |
||
| for i, code_block in enumerate( | ||
| parsed_markdowns["files"][origin_path]["code-blocks"] | ||
| ): | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@olehermanse was there a specific reason for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the logic is / was slightly different. During linting we always print the filenames with a pass or fail message.
On formatting we (should) print only the ones that were reformatted. I think in the beginning there was no code / return code to track whether something was reformatted or not.
It might also have been harder to get this information. When we use tools like prettier and black for formatting, they might have different patterns for their outputs. And I know we have switched in the past between running those tools on single files (slow, but more controlled) vs on entire directories (faster, but more complicated output / results).
We now do this in
cfengine format, only printing on reformatting, so it makes sense to do in incfengine dev format-docsas well.