Skip to content

chore: migrate google-cloud-config to librarian#8610

Open
jskeet wants to merge 1 commit into
googleapis:mainfrom
jskeet:scripted-migrate-google-cloud-config
Open

chore: migrate google-cloud-config to librarian#8610
jskeet wants to merge 1 commit into
googleapis:mainfrom
jskeet:scripted-migrate-google-cloud-config

Conversation

@jskeet

@jskeet jskeet commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@jskeet jskeet requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2026 08:01
@jskeet jskeet marked this pull request as draft June 12, 2026 08:04

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request enables generation for the google-cloud-configdelivery and google/cloud/config/v1 libraries by removing skip_generate: true in librarian.yaml and adding the necessary staging files for v1, while removing old alpha and beta proto files and their generated samples. The reviewer feedback highlights that the v1 API path is missing from the apis list in librarian.yaml and warns against manually editing the generated .repo-metadata.json file.

Comment thread librarian.yaml
"name": "infra-manager",
"name_pretty": "Infrastructure Manager",
"product_documentation": "https://cloud.google.com/infrastructure-manager/docs",
"release_level": "preview",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Do not manually edit generated client configuration JSON files. Any changes or updates must be made upstream in the generator.

References
  1. Do not manually edit generated client configuration JSON files. Any changes or updates must be made upstream in the generator.

@jskeet jskeet force-pushed the scripted-migrate-google-cloud-config branch from 41fd2ee to 8dee103 Compare June 12, 2026 08:10
@jskeet jskeet marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2026 08:11
@jskeet

jskeet commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Regenerated, and it became a "simple" API. I think I messed up when initially running my script. This should be an easy one to review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant