Skip to content

draft: decl check#14101

Draft
datokrat wants to merge 3 commits into
paul/base/decl-check-implicitfrom
paul/decl-check-implicit
Draft

draft: decl check#14101
datokrat wants to merge 3 commits into
paul/base/decl-check-implicitfrom
paul/decl-check-implicit

Conversation

@datokrat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@datokrat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!radar

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for cf12c6b against cdc3486 are in. No significant results found. @datokrat

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +596.6M (+0.01%)

Small changes (3🟥)

  • 🟥 build/module/Lean.AddDecl//instructions: +923.7M (+15.18%) (reduced significance based on *//lines)
  • 🟥 build/module/LeanChecker//instructions: +17.4M (+0.74%)
  • 🟥 mvcgen/sym/AddSubCancelDeep/700/kernel//wall-clock: +16ms (+5.00%)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Jun 18, 2026
@leanprover-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Reference manual CI status:

  • ❗ Reference manual CI can not be attempted yet, as the nightly-testing-2026-06-10 tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto nightly-with-manual, reference manual CI should run now. You can force reference manual CI using the force-manual-ci label. (2026-06-18 09:05:41)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the mathlib4-nightly-available A branch for this PR exists at leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing:lean-pr-testing-NNNN label Jun 18, 2026
@mathlib-lean-pr-testing mathlib-lean-pr-testing Bot added the breaks-mathlib This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan label Jun 18, 2026
@mathlib-lean-pr-testing

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Mathlib CI status (docs):

@datokrat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!radar

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for 9817d0f against cdc3486 are in. There are significant results. @datokrat

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +113.2G (+1.00%)
  • 🟥 other exited with code 1

Large changes (2🟥)

  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.DTreeMap.Internal.Lemmas//instructions: +5.7G (+2.98%)
  • 🟥 build/profile/type checking//wall-clock: +29s (+24.94%)

Medium changes (25🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

Small changes (482🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

@datokrat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!radar

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for e565a03 against cdc3486 are in. There are significant results. @datokrat

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +64.7G (+0.57%)

Large changes (1🟥)

  • 🟥 build/profile/type checking//wall-clock: +18s (+15.73%)

Medium changes (17🟥)

  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.DHashMap.Lemmas//instructions: +1.3G (+2.53%)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.DHashMap.RawLemmas//instructions: +1.4G (+1.04%)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.DTreeMap.Internal.Lemmas//instructions: +3.2G (+1.69%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.DTreeMap.Lemmas//instructions: +1.6G (+2.83%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.DTreeMap.Raw.Lemmas//instructions: +1.6G (+2.35%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.ExtDHashMap.Lemmas//instructions: +1.3G (+2.65%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.ExtDTreeMap.Lemmas//instructions: +1.4G (+2.91%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.ExtTreeMap.Lemmas//instructions: +1.1G (+3.79%)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.HashMap.Lemmas//instructions: +1.0G (+3.24%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.Internal.List.Associative//instructions: +1.5G (+1.91%)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.TreeMap.Lemmas//instructions: +1.2G (+3.88%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Data.TreeMap.Raw.Lemmas//instructions: +1.2G (+3.06%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Do.Triple.SpecLemmas//instructions: +1.7G (+6.35%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 build/module/Std.Internal.Do.Triple.SpecLemmas//instructions: +1.4G (+8.48%) (reduced significance based on absolute threshold)
  • 🟥 elab/simp_congr//instructions: +236.7M (+2.50%)
  • 🟥 misc/import Std.Data.DHashMap.Internal.RawLemmas//instructions: +1.9G (+0.84%)
  • 🟥 misc/import Std.Data.Internal.List.Associative//instructions: +1.6G (+2.25%)

Small changes (324🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaks-mathlib This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan mathlib4-nightly-available A branch for this PR exists at leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing:lean-pr-testing-NNNN toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants