Fixed checking for external type property on symbol#1256
Merged
Conversation
adwsingh
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What behavior changes?
The PR fixes a bug when custom integration's symbol provider set
SymbolProperties.EXTERNAL_TYPEtofalseon a symbol but the codegen still ignores the symbol/shape from generating the code.Why is this change needed?
Creating a codegen integration allows to override symbol provider. If a symbol provider sets
falseforSymbolProperties.EXTERNAL_TYPEthe codegen skips generating code for this shape completely. This is due to a wrong property check is some places.How was this validated?
Run tests, built locally and validated the output with the integration.
What should reviewers focus on?
Not much, its a 3 lines PR. But changes in this PR align with other changes in the repo already, e.g.:
smithy-java/codegen/codegen-core/src/main/java/software/amazon/smithy/java/codegen/generators/SchemaIndexGenerator.java
Line 196 in 964c6d3
smithy-java/codegen/codegen-core/src/main/java/software/amazon/smithy/java/codegen/generators/SchemaIndexGenerator.java
Line 75 in 964c6d3
smithy-java/codegen/codegen-core/src/main/java/software/amazon/smithy/java/codegen/generators/SchemaFieldOrder.java
Line 78 in 964c6d3
Additional Links
(this PR is somewhat related to #1198, but isn't really)
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.